Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaWMn2SaMqjmYQxV2FBUtuJ3uce28W=zS5n4T058u_Tow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Ah, apologies - that's due to moving the patch from the last CF (it was
> marked as RWF so I had to reopen it before moving it). I'll submit a new
> version of the patch shortly, please mark it as WOA until then.

So, the way it's supposed to work is you resubmit the patch first and
then re-activate the CF entry.  If you get to re-activate the CF entry
without actually updating the patch, and then submit the patch
afterwards, then the CF deadline becomes largely meaningless.  I think
a new patch should rejected as untimely.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing "workers launched" in expected output? Really?