Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaW=LaQAgS=m7H3LTXd4iJMZKYyMuvP3AXJSM14xYBiFQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The code is about 1200 lines and has extensive docs, comments and tests.
>
> There are no contentious infrastructure changes, so the debate around
> concurrency is probably the main one. So it looks to me like
> meaningful review has taken place, though I know Andrew and Pavan have
> also looked at it in detail.

Only design-level review, not detailed review of the code.  To be
clear, I think the design-level review was quite productive and I'm
glad it happened, but it's not a substitute for someone going over the
code in detail to look for problems.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11