Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaVp=C-Wbbo+4oD5eFM7J_uUf+arwB+RBhdika1kb5WCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:34 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> The lower memory usage also often will result in a better cache
> utilization - which is a crucial factor for index vacuuming when the
> index order isn't correlated with the heap order. Cache misses really
> are a crucial performance factor there.

Fair enough.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Asynchronous and "direct" IO support for PostgreSQL.