On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:19:51AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> >>> I'm going to revert that commit in HEAD shortly, unless Alvaro pops
>> >>> up and promises a fix PDQ. Or you could do the same.
>> >
>> >> I was thinking of changing master to look like the 9.4 version.
>> >
>> > [ shrug... ] IMO, a quick "git revert" is less work and leaves a cleaner
>> > state for Alvaro to apply whatever final solution he settles on.
>> > But do what you wish.
>>
>> OK, I've just reverted it.
>
> Can I ask about the logic of why this bug fix was backpatched, or is
> that clear to everyone but me.
What is your question, exactly? There was a fair amount of discussion
of whether and how to back-patch this on pgsql-hackers.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
