Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaT8M4v-68MM0UzWZQL9sBghPsbrccwxNoStjz4L4XRjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> OK, committed.  This is a good example of how having good code
>> coverage doesn't necessarily mean you've found all the bugs.  :-)
>>
> As of now partition_join.sql is not having test cases covering cases
> where partition table have default partition, attaching a small test
> case patch to cover those.

That's not that small, and to me it looks like overkill.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication