On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 3:44 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Last call for complaints about either the overall direction or the
> specific implementation choices...
A complaint showed up over at
http://postgr.es/m/979131631633278@mail.yandex.ru and pursuant to that
complaint I have made the new syntax for controlling the checkpoint
type look like CHECKPOINT { 'fast' | 'spread' } rather than just
having an option called FAST. It was suggested over there to also
rename WAIT to WAIT_WAL_ARCHIVED, but I don't like that for reasons
explained on that thread and so have not adopted that proposal.
Sergei also helpfully pointed out that I'd accidentally deleted a
version check in one place, so this version is also updated to not do
that.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
