On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:13 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> * The patch alleges to only block DROP ROLE commands when there exists
> _both_ admins of the target role and roles for which the target role is
> an admin. However, it's not clear to me why both need to be true. I
> might be able to glean the reason if I read this thread carefully or
> spend more time thinking about it, but IMHO that patch itself should make
> it obvious. I'd suggest expanding the comment atop
> check_drop_role_dependency().
The error message needs work, too. Nobody is ever going to guess what
the rule is from that error message.
> * Does this introduce any race conditions? For example, is it possible for
> the new check to pass and then for a dependency to be added before the
> drop completes?
This is a serious concern for me as well.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com