On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 20 December 2016 at 21:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We could implement this by having
>>> some process, like the background writer,
>>> SendProcSignal(PROCSIG_HOUSEKEEPING) to every process in the system
>>> every 10 minutes or so.
>
>> ... on a rolling basis.
>
> I don't understand why we'd make that a system-wide behavior at all,
> rather than expecting each process to manage its own cache.
Individual backends don't have a really great way to do time-based
stuff, do they? I mean, yes, there is enable_timeout() and friends,
but I think that requires quite a bit of bookkeeping.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
