Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaKMnde2W_=u7CqeCKi=FKnfbNQPwOR=c_3c8qD7b2nhQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:19 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:23 AM tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > On 8/24/22 12:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > This patch needed to be rebased pretty extensively after commit
> > > ce6b672e4455820a0348214be0da1a024c3f619f. Here is a new version.
> > Thanks, Robert, I have retested this patch with my previous scenarios
> > and things look good to me.
>
> I read through this again and found a comment that needed to be
> updated, so I did that, bumped catversion, and committed this.

Upon further review, this patch failed to update the documentation as
thoroughly as would have been desirable.

Here is a follow-up patch to correct a few oversights.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: use ARM intrinsics in pg_lfind32() where available
Next
From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Date:
Subject: Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL