Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Parallel Seq Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaHfsjqaYNp4pjqF=1ffiHeC-XMvE8S3kJFwopo_2O_ig@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't it better to destroy the memory for readers array as that gets
> allocated
> even if there are no workers available for execution?
>
> Attached patch fixes the issue by just destroying readers array.

Well, then you're making ExecGatherShutdownWorkers() not a no-op any
more.  I'll go commit a combination of your two patches.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL