On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> Probably it was my request. I don't like to using NULL as value, that should
> be ignored. The "hint" is clean, there NULL can be ignored, but what about
> DETAIL or MESSAGE?
If the field is required - as MESSAGE is - then its absence is an
error. If the field is optional, treat a NULL if the parameter were
not supplied.
> I am strong in my opinion about PLpgSQL RAISE statement behave, but on
> second hand, proposed function should not be 100% same as RAISE stmt. More
> we can simply add a parameter like "ignore_nulls"
I would be willing to bet you a drink that 99.9% of people will want
the behavior Jim is advocating, so I don't think this should be
configurable.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
