On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Great. Changed status to ready for commiter.
>
> The patch still applies, but no committer seem to be interested in the
> topic, so moved to next CF.
The general idea of this patch seems OK to me.
+ rel_lock = true;
I think it would look nicer to initialize this when you declare the
variable, instead of having a separate line of code for that purpose.
+ if (IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() && params->log_min_duration >= 0)
+ elevel = LOG;
+ else if (!IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess())
+ elevel = WARNING;
+ else
+ return;
This can be rewritten with only one call to
IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() by reversing the order of the branches.
+ PopActiveSnapshot();
+ CommitTransactionCommand();
+ return false;
vacuum_rel already has too many copies of this logic -- can we try to
avoid duplicating it into two more places? It seems like you could
easily do that like this:
int elevel = 0;
if (relation != NULL)
{
/* maybe set elevel */
}
if (elevel != 0)
{
if (!rel_lock)
/* emit message */
else
/* emit other message */
}
This wouldn't be the first bit of code to assume that elevel == 0 can
be used as a sentinel value meaning "none", so I think it's OK to do
that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
