Re: New Event Trigger: table_rewrite - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: New Event Trigger: table_rewrite
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa5sotcxVyVR_iq1gR_z9D3LnHcqgU9BXHq=j-Br-nYdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New Event Trigger: table_rewrite  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> It seems pretty weird, also, that the event trigger will fire after
>>> we've taken AccessExclusiveLock when you cluster a particular
>>> relation, and before we've taken AccessExclusiveLock when you cluster
>>> database-wide.  That's more or less an implementation artifact of the
>>> current code that we're exposing to the use for, really, no good
>>> reason.
>>
>> In the CLUSTER implementation we have only one call site for invoking
>> the Event Trigger, in cluster_rel(). While it's true that in the single
>> relation case, the relation is opened in cluster() then cluster_rel() is
>> called, the opening is done with NoLock in cluster():
>>
>>                 rel = heap_open(tableOid, NoLock);
>>
>> My understanding is that the relation locking only happens in
>> cluster_rel() at this line:
>>
>>         OldHeap = try_relation_open(tableOid, AccessExclusiveLock);
>>
>> Please help me through the cluster locking strategy here, I feel like
>> I'm missing something obvious, as my conclusion from re-reading the code
>> in lights of your comment is that your comment is not accurate with
>> respect to the current state of the code.
>
> Unless I'm missing something, when you cluster a particular relation,
> cluster() does this:
>
>                 /* Find and lock the table */
>                 rel = heap_openrv(stmt->relation, AccessExclusiveLock);
>
> I don't see the "rel = heap_open(tableOid, NoLock);" line you quoted anywhere.

...which is because I have the 9.1 branch checked out.  Genius.  But
what I said originally is still true, because the current code looks
like this:
               /* Find, lock, and check permissions on the table */               tableOid =
RangeVarGetRelidExtended(stmt->relation,
                AccessExclusiveLock,
                false, false,
                RangeVarCallbackOwnsTable, NULL);               rel = heap_open(tableOid, NoLock);

It's true that the heap_open() is not acquiring any lock.  But the
RangeVarGetRelidExtended() call right before it is.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Increasing test coverage of WAL redo functions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces