On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2019-04-06 16:13:53 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 11:31:31AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Yes, but Fujii-san pointed out that this option doesn't support toast
> > > tables and I think there is not specific reason why not supporting
> > > them. So it might be good to add toast.vacuum_index_cleanup. Attached
> > > patch.
> >
> > Being able to control that option at toast level sounds sensible. I
> > have added an open item about that.
>
> Robert, what is your stance on this open item? It's been an open item
> for about three weeks, without any progress.
The actual bug in this patch needs to be fixed, but I see we have
another open item for that. This open item, as I understand it, is
all about whether we should add another reloption so that you can
control this behavior separately for TOAST tables. In my opinion,
that's not a critical change and the open item should be dropped, but
others might see it differently.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
