On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:48 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Thanks for that. Attached is just a rebased version with a commit
> message added. If there aren't any other concerns, I'll commit this in
> the next few days and back-patch it. When it comes to 12 and older,
> does anyone want to opine about the wait event to use? I was thinking
> PG_WAIT_TIMEOUT or WAIT_EVENT_PG_SLEEP ...
I'm not sure if we should back-patch this, but I think if you do you
should just add a wait event, rather than using a generic one.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com