On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think we should content ourselves with improving the demonstrated
> case, which is where we're forced to do a lot of heap fetches due
> to lots of not-all-visible tuples. Whether we can spend a lot of
> time scanning the index without ever finding a tuple at all seems
> hypothetical. Without more evidence of a real problem, I do not
> wish to inject warts as horrid as this one into the index AM API.
All right. I've been bitten by this problem enough that I'm a little
gun-shy about accepting anything that doesn't feel like a 100%
solution, but I admit that the scenario I described does seem a little
bit far-fetched.
I won't be completely shocked if somebody finds a way to hit it, though.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
