Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa476xJHMtWbaGXoYH=ghtmhQA67aWXDXP6PrrrWe2Yjw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:57 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In the case at hand, I'd personally avoid a ternary op for the first
> assignment because then the line would run over 80 characters, and
> you'd have to make decisions about where to break it.  (We don't have
> a standardized convention about that, and none of the alternatives
> look very good to my eye.)

This is exactly why I rarely use ?:

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly