Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa-44L5_bXY0Wrt5R2Efbf6eZOnRAtYKDOBuTXn48rE3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
>> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
>> defined locally in 9.5.  How about "unique constraints or exclusion
>> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"?  Attached is a
>> patch for that.
>
> Makes sense to me.

Me, too.  Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for dogfood volunteers (was No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements