Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQvQVEBnnKw_2qtKW4vDjBtZdiDVsFyuAPA0er4oWcPPw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
> defined locally in 9.5.  How about "unique constraints or exclusion
> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"?  Attached is a
> patch for that.

Makes sense to me.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual