On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
> defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion
> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a
> patch for that.
Makes sense to me.
--
Peter Geoghegan