On 2015/10/03 5:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
>>> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
>>> defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion
>>> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a
>>> patch for that.
>> Makes sense to me.
> Me, too. Committed.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
