Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZzSJpxjteW=+2HD9SKtmMZJs-VqX+scaMg2HG1qA26pA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah, I had hoped that this might make a noticeable difference on slower
> buildfarm animals, but some testing shows that it's more likely to be
> barely above the noise floor.

Any idea why?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: http2 wire format