Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZybB5k7J01LeTSHX9bO2R+52mBwU_SudQRpm-P3SQu_g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE  ("Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>)
Responses Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
>>
>> What exactly do you mean by "ignores"?  pg_restore prints results to
>> standard output unless a database name is specified.  AFAIK, there's
>> no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database restore to whatever you
>> think the default database is".
>
> That's right, and that seems contradictory with:
>
> "This utility [pg_restore], like most other PostgreSQL utilities, also uses the environment
> variables supported by libpq (see Section 31.13)."
>
> as pg_restore does 'ignore' (for want of a better word) PGDATABASE.
>
> But I think I can conclude from your reply that that behaviour is indeed intentional.

It is, because we want there to be a way of converting a custom or tar
format archive back to text.  I think that probably works out for the
best anyway, since pg_restore is a sufficiently dangerous operation
that you want to be darn sure you're not doing it on the wrong
database.  dropdb also requires a database name, while createdb does
not, for similar reasons...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: wal_buffers