On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> To repeat myself, for emphasis: *Not all bloat is equal*.
+1.
> I strongly agree. I simply don't understand how you can adopt UNDO for
> MVCC, and yet expect to get a benefit commensurate with the effort
> without also implementing "retail index tuple deletion" first.
I agree that we need retail index tuple deletion. I liked Claudio's
idea at http://postgr.es/m/CAGTBQpZ-kTRQiAa13xG1GNe461YOwrA-s-ycCQPtyFrpKTaDBQ@mail.gmail.com
-- that seems indispensible to making retail index tuple deletion
reasonably efficient. Is anybody going to work on getting that
committed?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
