Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZsn_uoR=L-T5uwHhriO=qC6GTX02ssmnmkAMY-VwHoyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though.

Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current
message is just wrong, right?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexey Kondratov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback