Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZsfpsqqVqYu2V9LAKoBzg8yAGiSuoL5icNcZciCL1arQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup  (Ahsan Hadi <ahsan.hadi@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:49 AM Ahsan Hadi <ahsan.hadi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fair enough. Some of this is also due to backup related features i.e backup manifest, progress reporting that got
committedto master towards the tail end of PG-13. Rushing to get parallel backup feature compatible with these features
alsocaused some of the oversights. 

Sure, but there's also no point in rushing out a feature that's in a
state where it's got no chance of being acceptable, and quite a number
of these problems are not new, either.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: documenting the backup manifest file format
Next
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other