Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZsOQTvvcYAxxwinD5DZ2WC0mBL8oknwsT1dEX5xm0XaQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Gotta have config files in place already, no?

Why?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)