On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> I don't know, either. You read both Robert and me indicating that this bug
> fix will be better with a test, and nobody has said that a test-free fix is
> optimal. Here's your chance to obliterate that no-tests precedent.
In the interest of clarity, I was not intending to say that there
should be a regression test in the patch. I was intending to say that
there should be a test case with the bug report. I'm not opposed to
adding a regression test, and I like the idea of attempting to do so
while requiring only a relatively small amount of data by changing
maintenance_work_mem, but that wasn't the target at which I was
aiming. Nevertheless, carry on.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
