Re: [HACKERS] Press Release Draft - 2016-02-09 Cumulative Update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Press Release Draft - 2016-02-09 Cumulative Update
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZqZAEy_-_P_Gmj8PerYj+o8g3iwmSU4508f_R=2a7Y_g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Press Release Draft - 2016-02-09 Cumulative Update  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
>   11 There existed a race condition /where/ if CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was
> called on a column that had not been indexed before, then rows that were
> updated by transactions running at the same time as the CREATE INDEX
> CONCURRENTLY command /may not/ have been indexed incorrectly.

I think this is moot at this point, but "may not have been indexed
incorrectly" seems to have two negatives where there should be only
one.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Markus Nullmeier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Faster Expression Processing and Tuple Deforming(including JIT)