Re: Network failure may prevent promotion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Network failure may prevent promotion
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZneP50v-dFe6U2Tcrdm2MPOMaiB=o3EVgbHQky53mpEg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Network failure may prevent promotion  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 2:32 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> [ new patch set ]

Hi,

I think it would be helpful to make it more clear exactly what's going
on here. It looks 0001 is intended to revert
21ef4d4d897563adb2f7920ad53b734950f1e0a4, which was itself a revert of
728f86fec65537eade8d9e751961782ddb527934, and then I guess the
remaining patches are to fix up issues created by that commit, but the
commit messages aren't meaningful so it's hard to understand what is
being fixed.

I think it would also be useful to clarify whether this is imagined to
be for master only, or something to be back-patched. In addition to
mentioning that here, it would be good to add that information to the
target version field of  https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4748/

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Dump-restore loosing 'attnotnull' bit for DEFERRABLE PRIMARY KEY column(s).
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?