Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZnDvR73Cmps+3V9Pm+FSJpEUV618hVQXBLQ-XJKCYKGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I was feeling a bit uncomfortable with the BUFFERALIGN_DOWN() for a
> different reason: if the caller has specified the exact amount of space it
> needs, having shm_toc_create discard some could lead to an unexpected
> failure.

Well, that's why Heikki also patched shm_toc_estimate.  With the
patch, if the size being used in shm_toc_create comes from
shm_toc_estimate, it will always be aligned and nothing bad will
happen.  If the user invents another size out of whole cloth, then
they might get a few bytes less than they expect, but that's what you
get for not using shm_toc_estimate().

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()