Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZiaTv1aaOrxaEwtxwL=MPwfLnd+65kKBP+zvzXQ1_Abg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The patch still applies (with some hunks).  I have added it in CF [1]
>> to avoid losing track.
>>
>> [1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1341/
>
> This did not get reviews and the patch still applies. I am moving it to next CF.

I'd like to break this into two patches, one to fix the general
background worker problems and another to fix the problems specific to
parallel query.

The attached version extracts the two fixes for general background
worker problems from Amit's patch and adjust the comments a bit more
extensively than he did.  Barring objections, I'll commit and
back-patch this; then we can deal with the other part of this
afterward.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current