On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 1:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Still wondering if there's really no CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPT anywhere
> > else in this loop.
>
> I did some experimentation using the test case Jakub presented
> to start with, and verified that that loop does respond promptly
> to control-C even in HEAD. So there are CFI(s) in the loop as
> I thought, and we don't need another.
OK. Although an extra CFI isn't such a bad thing, either.
> What we do need is some more work on nearby comments. I'll
> see about that and push it.
Great!
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
