Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZgqUYyq5mgL6BA_6qfT+paAtv6qY4=s5uEoAy7yXDdeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand it now. My opinion is so some operators and index search
> can be in 9.2 - so use a JSON just as communication format now.
>
> * we need to build JSON
> * we need to check if some is valid JSON
> * we need to store JSON
>
> other steps should be (9.2)
> * basic operators eq, neeq
> * some tool like XQuery - simple query on JSON document available from
> SQL that can be used for functional indexes.

That would be nice, but let's not let the perfect be the enemy of the
good.  We don't have a lot of time here.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] Double-write with Fast Checksums
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] Double-write with Fast Checksums