On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>> OK, simple enough. New patch attached. I still need to do some
>> testing to verify this does not break anything, but other than
>> that, any complaints (including the notion of backpatching this
>> back to 9.1)?
>
> Here's a cleaned up version, which also includes documentation. I'll
> commit back to 9.1 in a day or two unless there are any objections.
Changing SQL syntax in the back-branches isn't normally something we
do, but I confess I don't see any real reason not to do it in this
case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
