Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZdX2nhx6YgkegeN3SQzj9GYQoDqQE8sxD7sGpTkZyXbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> On the other point of dispute about the operator tables: for the
> moment I'm leaning towards keeping the text descriptions.

I mostly suggested nuking them just to try to make the table more
readable. But since you've found another (and better) solution to that
problem, I withdraw that suggestion.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: return value from pq_putmessage() is widely ignored