Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id 25086.1587154946@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> On the other point of dispute about the operator tables: for the
>> moment I'm leaning towards keeping the text descriptions.

> I mostly suggested nuking them just to try to make the table more
> readable. But since you've found another (and better) solution to that
> problem, I withdraw that suggestion.

Cool, then we're all on the same page.  I shall press forward.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: return value from pq_putmessage() is widely ignored
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.