Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZcjnMe0cHQNa=L8gn8a331PYHdD4rkxD9HL7GhH7wxYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Changed SRF in targetlist handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2016-08-17 17:41:28 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Tom, do you think this is roughly going in the right direction?
>
> I've not had time to look at this patch, I'm afraid.  If you still
> want me to, I can make time in a day or so.

Tom, it's been about 3.5 months since you wrote this.  I think it
would be really valuable if you could get to this RSN because the
large patch set posted on the "Changed SRF in targetlist handling"
thread is backed up behind this -- and I think that's really valuable
work which I don't want to see slip out of this release.  At the same
time, both that and this are quite invasive, and I don't want it all
to get committed the day before feature freeze, because that will mess
up the schedule.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump vs. TRANSFORMs