On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 12:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah. I've seen some older compilers complain about that code before,
> but now there are over a dozen buildfarm members warning about it.
> It's clearly a false positive, since checkPointLoc does get set in
> the read_backup_label()-failure-return code path. I think we've
> seen a few other places where likely-to-be-inlined functions have
> to initialize their result variables to prevent compiler warnings,
> so I stuck an initialization step into read_backup_label in hopes
> of silencing it.
That makes sense, and sorry for not noticing this discussion sooner.
But, I'm a bit confused about what's going on here. Why did we start
getting this complaint only now? AFAICS I didn't change anything about
how checkPointLoc is handled. It's an XLogRecPtr, not a TLI, and all
the stuff I changed has to do with TLI handling. I think, anyway.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
