Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZaDAOkNjDOah9-2Z9Zho2G94qggcY6U_hxRp5ATLFGYg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
> I want to give everyone else a chance to weigh in before I start
> the pendulum swinging back in the other direction on OIDs in MVs.
> Opinions?

I agree that it's probably better to just disallow this, but I have to
admit I don't like your proposed patch much.  It seems to me that the
right place to fix this is in interpretOidsOption(), by returning
false rather than default_with_oids whenever the relation is a
materialized view.  That would require passing the relkind as an
additional argument to interpretOidsOption(), but that doesn't seem
problematic.

Then, the parser could just error out if OIDS=anything appears in the
options list, but it wouldn't need to actually kludge the options list
as you've done here.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade segfaults when given an invalid PGSERVICE value
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's invent a function to report lock-wait-blocking PIDs