Re: IDLE in transaction introspection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ_cj0HmDnad_rRZeX7hVu1cuzPnXGKPnCzLZB38SABBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IDLE in transaction introspection  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert's point about sinval catchup is another good one, though
> I don't remember what that does to the pg_stat_activity display.

My thought was that sinval catchup might require acquiring a relation
lock (e.g. on pg_class), and that might block waiting for a lock.

Not sure it's possible, but even if it can't happen today, it doesn't
seem impossible that we might want to let it happen in the future.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: warning in pg_upgrade
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Show sequences owned by