On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In fact, I'm going to go further and say that I do not like the entire
> concept of scannability, either as to design or implementation, and
> I think we should just plain rip it out.
This has been my feeling from the beginning, so I'm happy to support
this position. I think the current version - where scan-ability is
tracked in just one way - is an improvement over the previous version
of the patch - where it was tracked in two different ways with a
confusing shuffle of information from one place to the other. But my
favorite number of places to track it would be zero.
...Robert
