Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZYBc7HO6CfCTaksD40UyeM8+6_ShXs6XrYu5H0UC4SLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Attached is an updated version for that.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch.

Committed with a few changes.  The big one was that I got rid of the
local variable is_update in ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting.  That
saved a level of indentation on a substantial chunk of code, and it
turns out that test was redundant anyway.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Next
From: Nikolay Shaplov
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead