Re: REVOKE [ADMIN OPTION FOR] ROLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: REVOKE [ADMIN OPTION FOR] ROLE
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZY831pYUY3QZu6hFozs4nXGfP6a=1Ys+HbcLqFYBGkTg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to REVOKE [ADMIN OPTION FOR] ROLE  (Egor Rogov <e.rogov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: REVOKE [ADMIN OPTION FOR] ROLE  (Egor Rogov <e.rogov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Egor Rogov <e.rogov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> So, the question: is it a documentation bug (as it seems to me), code bug,
> or I missed something?

Your analysis looks right to me, but I don't know whether the code or
the documentation should be changed.  This claim was added by Tom Lane
in 2005 in commit 58d214e51fe50b10b4439da6ec263d54c155afbf.  It might
be worth checking whether the claim was true at that time and later
became false, or whether it was never true to begin with.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Paul Ramsey
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: "make check" changes have caused buildfarm deterioration.