On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
>> It feels a bit like unpredictable magic to have "DEFAULT" mean one
>> thing and omitted columns mean something else.
>
> Agreed. The current code behaves that way, but I think that's
> indisputably a bug not behavior we want to keep.
I'm not entirely convinced that's a bug. Both behaviors seem useful,
and there has to be some way to specify each one.
But I just work here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company