On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > WRT performance: I agree that fixed-width identifiers are more
>> > performant, that's why I went for them, but I am not sure it's that
>> > important. The performance sensitive parts should all be done using the
>> > internal id the identifier maps to, not the public one.
>>
>> But I thought the internal identifier was exactly what we're creating.
>
> Sure. But how often are we a) going to create such an identifier b)
> looking it up?
Never. Make that the replication solution's problem. Make the core
support deal only with UUIDs or pairs of 64-bit integers or something
like that, and let the replication solution decide what they mean.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
