Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZWSLUjVcc9KBSVvbn=U5QRgW1O-MgUX0y5CnLZOA2qyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
Responses Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:17 AM Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote:
> > The buildfarm thinks additional nitpicking is needed.
>
> hm. Patch was committed with debug1 level tests and many animals uses log_statement = 'all'. Therefore they have
additionalline in result: LOG:  statement: alter table pg_class alter column relname drop not null; and similar for
otherqueries.
 
> I think we better would be to revert "set client_min_messages to 'debug1';"  part.

Ugh, I guess so.  Or how about changing the message itself to  use
INFO, like we already do in QueuePartitionConstraintValidation?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing