Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZVyd4u4ks6MLUNPgZ3nGYhXvNZY_8RS_tq7edh5P1drQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Looks correct, so incorporated in the attached updated patch.  Thanks.

This seems like a hacky way to limit the reloptions to just OIDs.
Shouldn't we instead have a new RELOPT_KIND_PARTITIONED or something
like that?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Unpinning error in parallel worker
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Monitoring roles patch