Re: UPSERT on partition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: UPSERT on partition
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZUc4rSjfkm4jhg4fsL5CB4nqEipfypNeLntXWQUc4hEQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UPSERT on partition  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: UPSERT on partition  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: UPSERT on partition  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2015-06-24 23:05:45 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> INSERT ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE doesn't seem to work on the current partitioning
>> mechanism. For example, in the following SQL commands, the last UPSERT command
>> would fail with an error. The error message is
>
> I think that's pretty much inevitable without baking in touple routing
> into the core system and supporting unique-constraints that span
> partitions. In other words, I don't think this is upsert's fault.

Is the root of the problem that the trigger is called for an INSERT ..
ON CONFLICT statement but it turns that into a plain INSERT?

Is there any way of writing a partitioning trigger that doesn't have
that defect?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)