Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZU9nBd6m3NQohzjpdvBNtw+6UGoz+uqoaawkXy76gYSg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we
> can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we
> haven't had complaints.

What's wrong with the approach proposed in
http://postgr.es/m/55AFC302.1060805@iki.fi ?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: untrusted PLs should be GRANTable
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.