On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 06:42:10AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we
>> can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we
>> haven't had complaints.
>
> What's wrong with the approach proposed in
> http://postgr.es/m/55AFC302.1060805@iki.fi ?
For back-branches that's very invasive so that seems risky to me
particularly seeing the low number of complaints on the matter.
--
Michael
